The Old Man and the Sea
As literature entered the modernist period, classical plot and storyline gradually receded into the background, and accepted ways of opening, developing and concluding a story were consigned to the paper-basket of literary history. This, as we have seen, was already a hallmark of Anton Chekhov’s approach to short stories. Style of writing became one of the factors that determined modernity, as did an individual perspective on reality, as the accepted rules of the traditional craft of writing faded. A sharper focus was placed on everyday life as mirrored through the authentic and personal experience of the author. This was called a “slice of life” approach. As the short story form developed, emphasis was placed on the overall emotional effect or impact of the story on the reader.
The
stories of Ernest Hemingway (1899 – 1961) fit nicely into this modernist
approach. The latter began his career as
a cub reporter on The Kansas City Star where the style guide was
succinct and clear, one might say even a little modernist: “Use short
sentences. Use short first
paragraphs. Use vigorous English. Be positive, not negative.” Hemingway kept this counsel for his whole
career as his oeuvre bears all the hallmarks of that sage advice. The novella The Old Man and the Sea
(1952) is a fitting example of such a clear, precise and economical writing
style, which is often called “spare” in the literature. Hemingway himself
described his style as reflecting his famous “iceberg theory” – simple, direct
prose with deep meaning beneath the surface. There is not a redundant word in a
text that simply jumps off the page and comes alive with delight in the
reader’s imagination.
Before
space became the focus of our wonder, the sea presented an equally powerful
source of awe for humankind. Ernest
Hemingway, like many a keen sailor, was besotted with the sea, and in 1934 he
bought a fine fishing boat he named Pilar for some $ 7,500, the
equivalent of $ 180,000 in today’s money. He was essentially the archetype of a
“man’s man” who loved all alpha male sports and pursuits such as bullfighting,
big game hunting, boxing, deep sea fishing, arm wrestling, war correspondence,
even brawling on occasion and so on. His books are replete with such virile
activities. His writing style, which I
have described above, could also be fittingly referred to as “muscular prose,” a
style that is manifested in short, sharp sentences, crisp concrete nouns and
sustained understatement.
However, here we are only concerned with deep-sea fishing. Hemingway engaged in many Cuban fishing trips for much of his life, and in this short book, a novella, he has distilled much of his sea-faring experience for us readers. The Old Man and the Sea was written in 1952 when the writer was 52/53. It tells the story of an ageing Cuban fisherman, named Santiago, who battles a giant marlin. And marlins are certainly gigantic, where the Blue Marlin, the largest of the species, can reach up to fourteen feet (4.3 m) and can weigh over 2,000 pounds (900 kg). Santiago estimates his catch to be 1,500 pounds (680 kg) – still a magnificent fish. Indeed, while researching for this brief review, I came across a famous photograph of Hemingway with his family, pictured in front of four blue marlins on the dock in Bimini, Bahamas, that dates from 1935. This iconic photo shows a rare glimpse into his family life and his passion for big-game fishing from early on.
Anyway,
after 84 days without catching a bite, Santiago heads out to sea to break his
run of bad luck. Indeed, his devoted
young acolyte or apprentice, Manolin, is not accompanying his mentor on this
particular trip as his parents have insisted he change mentors because the old
man has simply become unlucky. On the
eighty-fifth day, Santiago, the old fisherman, hooks a strong and determined
marlin, and the novella recounts the great virile struggle between the man and
the fish, between the man and the sea, between humankind and the elements. To capture a marlin single-handed from one’s
own lowly fishing boat or skiff would be the sign of a master fisherman for all
traditional islanders.
The
emergent themes in the novella are resilience, pride, love of nature and the
wild, and, most especially, human endurance.
As such a distillation of humanity’s positive virtues, expressed in
clear, crisp and precise prose, it won the Pulitzer Prize in 1953, and was
instrumental in Hemingway’s winning of the Nobel Prize for Literature in
1954. Fitting accolades for any
brilliant writer.
On the
very first page, we read that Santiago was old “except his eyes, and they were
the same colour as the sea and were cheerful and undefeated.” This sums up the pride, resilience and spirit
of the old man, which are evident throughout the novella. We also learn immediately that Manolin, his
now former apprentice, respects, and indeed loves the old man: “I must have
water here for him, the boy thought, and soap and a good towel. Why am I so thoughtless? I must get him another shirt and a jacket for
the winter, and some sort of shoes and another blanket.” (p. 15)
There is
also great respect shown for nature, the sea and its creatures by the old
fisherman, a profound respect that borders on a spiritual
connection. Notice the simplicity of the
following lines: “Santiago was very fond of flying fish as they were his
principal friends on the ocean. He was
sorry for the birds, especially the small, delicate dark terns that were always
flying and looking and almost never finding, and he thought. ‘The birds have a
harder life than we do … Why did they make birds so delicate and fine as those
sea swallows when the ocean can be so cruel?’” (p. 22-23) Shades of St Francis
here, at least a little in my estimation. Likewise, he truly loved the sea as
the mother of life: “He always thought of the sea as la mar, which is
what people call her in Spanish when they love her. Some of the younger fishermen… spoke of her
as el mar, which is masculine.
They spoke of her as a contestant or a place, or even an enemy. But the old man always thought of her as
feminine… The moon affects her as it does a woman, he thought.” (p. 23) Even on
killing a tuna for his evening meal, “the old man hit him on the head for
kindness” lest the fish suffer unwarranted pain.
Santiago,
like Hemingway, was a great reader of the signs of nature, the direction and
strength of the winds, the vagaries of the Gulf Stream, the behaviour and
direction of the schools of dolphin and the flights of flying fish, and through
it all he says to himself: “But perhaps I will pick up a stray school of
dolphin and perhaps my big fish is around them.
My big fish must be somewhere.” (p. 27) That is Santiago’s big dream,
the source and summit of his life as a fisherman. His struggle with the great marlin is
archetypal of the struggle of all alpha males to attain meaning and purpose
in their lives, and a little less symbolic of all our individual struggles to
find some meaning in our own lives. That
struggle is at once a strange mix of Good and Evil, Light and Dark, Hope and
Despair, Fear and Courage and so on.
There really and truly is no chemically pure emotion, or indeed a
chemically pure virtue. For instance,
let’s witness Santiago’s respect for the quarry he is about to capture and
kill: “Then he began to pity the great fish that he had hooked. He is wonderful and strange, and who knows how
old he is, he thought. Never had I such
a strong fish nor one who acted so strangely… But what a great fish he is, and
what he will bring in the market if the flesh is good. He took the bait like a male, and his fight
has no panic in it. I wonder if he has
any plans or if he is just as desperate as I am.” (p. 40) Or this realistic
statement where deep feelings of love and the cruel nature of life overlap:
“Fish,” he said, “I love you and respect you very much. But I will kill you dead before the day
ends.” Santiago knows that he is
struggling against a worthy adversary in the marlin, a great fisherman against
a great fish, and he recalls once when he arm wrestled a worthy opponent for
many hours long ago in the distant past. (See p. 58 – 60). He also sees himself as a fighter like the
great baseball player DiMaggio: “I must be worthy of the great DiMaggio who
does all things perfectly, even with the pain of the bone spur in his heel.” (p.
57) Later, talking about his wounded hands, Santiago avers that “It is not bad…
and pain does not matter to a man” (p. 72)
The old
man shows great fortitude as he struggles to land the great marlin he has
hooked, suffers cuts to his hands, which he relieves by washing them in the seawater, and keeps the line appropriately balanced across his back by alternating
it over either shoulder. All of this
requires not only great strength but great patience, determination and
skill. Also, his great experience and
knowledge of the sea help him in his task: “The slant of the line showed he was
swimming at a lesser depth.” (p. 44) Along the way, the old man talks to birds
and flying fish with respect, and does so mainly to encourage himself in the
pursuit of his bounty: “You’re feeling it now, fish,” he said. “And so, God
knows, am I.” (p. 46) One of his hands becomes cramped in position, and he talks
to it by way of inspiring himself to accept its need to recuperate and entice
it to open. Contradictions fill his mind: “I wish I could feed the fish, he
thought. He is my brother. But I must kill him and keep strong to do
it.” (p. 49) Shades again of the idealism of St Francis’ love of nature
tempered by the harsh necessities of real life.
Rarely
could Hemingway’s spare style be said to rise to a poetic flourish, but on
occasions, one is struck by a poetic passage: “He looked across the sea and knew
how alone he was now. But he could see
the prisms in the deep dark water and the line stretching ahead and the strange
undulation of the calm. The clouds were
building up now for the trade wind, and he looked ahead and saw a flight of wild
ducks etching themselves against the sky over the water, then blurring, then
etching again, and he knew no man was ever alone on the sea.” This poetic paragraph reminds me of Mary
Oliver’s famous poem “Wild Geese.”
The kill
is described clearly in Hemingway’s spare style: “He lifted the harpoon as high
as he could and drove it down with all his strength…. He felt the iron go in
and he leaned on it and drove it further…. Then the fish came alive, with his
death in him, and he rose high out of the water, showing all his great length
and width and all his power and all his beauty.
He seemed to hang in the air above the old man and the skiff. Then he fell into the water with a crash that
sent spray over the old man and over all of the skiff.” (p. 80-81) Once again,
the old man has contradictory thoughts, or as we say in modern psychological
terms, he experiences some cognitive dissonance, or in Keatsian terms, "negative capability." He feels both pride and regret, pride in his
achievement but remorse for having killed such a great and beautiful creature:
“I have killed the fish which is my brother.” (p. 81)
Santiago
ties the great fish to the side of his skiff: “They were sailing together
lashed side by side…” (p. 85).
Unfortunately, during the night, many sharks attacked the old fisherman’s
huge catch, eventually eating the great marlin down to its white skeleton. Again, with great courage, he manages to kill
and injure many of their number. At
first, he feels very defeated and says he would prefer to be destroyed rather
than defeated. However, as he eventually
makes it home to Havana, despite being much in pain and being exceedingly
tired, the compassion and love of his fishing community show that they are
proud of the old man’s courage, tenacity and indomitable human spirit. No matter how bad things turned out, he still
had the great white skeleton of the fish, “eighteen feet from nose to tail,”
lashed to the side of his skiff to witness to his great and courageous
spirit. The novella ends as it started,
with the boy caring once again for his mentor: “The boy saw that the old man
was breathing, and then he saw the old man’s hands, and he started to cry. He went out very quietly to go to bring some
coffee, and all the way down the road, he was crying.” (p. 105) In short, we can
be down or defeated, but never crushed when we have done our very best in any
situation and when the community of which we are part wraps its love and care
around us. An exceptionally inspiring
read.


Comments
Post a Comment